# Ready-to-paste phase prompts (forward pipeline) Forward counterpart of [`../reviewer/session-prompts.md`](../reviewer/session-prompts.md). Copy one block into a fresh session, set the **model named in the prompt**, go. Plan + DAG: [`phase-orchestration.md`](phase-orchestration.md). Design: [`feature-dev-agentic-system.md`](feature-dev-agentic-system.md). Shared conventions (baked into each prompt): - Repo `/Users/tarikmoussa/Desktop/ConformalLabpp`, base `main`; push to the **eulernest fork** = remote `origin`; open the PR via the Gitea API (`/api/v1/repos/conformallab/ConformalLabpp/pulls`, basic-auth from the `origin` URL). - Build/test: `cmake -S code -B build-cgal -DWITH_CGAL_TESTS=ON && cmake --build build-cgal --target conformallab_cgal_tests -j8 && ctest --test-dir build-cgal -R '^cgal\.'`. Add `/test-cgal` (and `/quality-gates` where relevant) to the PR-head commit message so CI runs the full suites (they are keyword-triggered). - **Port items:** add `// Ported from ` provenance + Java golden-oracle parity tests. **Research items:** run the **spike** first (separate Opus session) and only productionise on GO. - Finish: **review gate** (Opus), then update status in `phase-orchestration.md` (phase → ✅). --- ## W0·9g.1 — Conformal-quality measures (port) · model: **Sonnet** ``` Use Sonnet. Repo /Users/tarikmoussa/Desktop/ConformalLabpp, new branch off main `feat/9g1-conformal-quality`. This is a Java PORT, no new theory (phases.md §9g.1). Create code/include/conformal_quality.hpp porting these Java measures (math is GUI-independent — lift only the math): - IsothermicityMeasure (plugin/visualizer/IsothermicityMeasure.java) — pointwise deviation from conformality (anisotropy of the induced metric). - DiscreteConformalEquivalencemMeasure (…/DiscreteConformalEquivalencemMeasure.java) — per-edge length-cross-ratio residual vs the conformal-equivalence condition. - FlippedTriangles (…/FlippedTriangles.java) — detect inverted/degenerate triangles in a 2-D layout (embedding-validity). - LengthCrossRatio (heds/adapter/types/LengthCrossRatio.java) — the discrete conformal invariant per edge (shared input for the two measures). - ConvergenceUtility metrics (convergence/ConvergenceUtility.java, math/float only): getMaxMeanSumCrossRatio (q=(a·c)/(b·d), qfun=(q+1/q)/2−1), getMaxMeanSumMultiRatio (per-face product, =1 iff conformal), getMaxMeanSumScaleInvariantCircumRadius (R/√A). Math reference: Springborn-Schröder-Pinkall 2008 (length cross-ratio = discrete conformal invariant). Java reference path: /Users/tarikmoussa/Desktop/conformallab/src/... Validation (port battery): golden values read from the Java outputs on a small mesh; a unit flipped-triangle case; run the measures on the converged cathead/brezel layouts from the existing euclidean pipeline and assert near-conformality. Per-finding commits, trailer `Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 `. Build + full CGAL suite green. Push, open PR (base main, head commit message contains `/test-cgal /quality-gates`). Update phase-orchestration.md (9g.1 → ✅) + a row in doc/math/validation.md and references.md. Report PR URL + test count. Then hand off to the audit system: note "audit module conformal_quality.hpp" in doc/reviewer/finding-orchestration.md backlog. ``` --- ## W0·9h — CLI extensions (infra) · model: **Sonnet** (or Haiku for 9h.1) ``` Use Sonnet. Repo as above, new branch off main `feat/9h-cli`. Two independent CLI tasks (phases.md §9h), no new theory. 9h.1 (~30 min): expose Newton tuning in code/src/apps/v0/conformallab_cli.cpp — app.add_option("--tol", tol, "Newton gradient tolerance [1e-8]"); app.add_option("--max-iter", max_iter, "Newton iteration limit [200]"); thread both through run_euclidean / run_spherical / run_hyper_ideal. Update the CLI parameter table in doc/getting-started.md. 9h.2 (~2–4 h): expose the Phase-9a models (already in the library + CGAL API) to the CLI: -g cp_euclidean → run_cp_euclidean() -g inversive_distance → run_inversive_distance() following the existing run_euclidean() pattern (~60 lines each); add both strings to the CLI::IsMember validator. Update README + getting-started.md. Validation: CLI smoke runs on a small mesh for each new flag/model; assert non-zero exit on bad input. Build + full CGAL suite green. Commit (Sonnet trailer), push, PR (base main, `/test-cgal` in head commit). Update phase-orchestration.md (9h.1, 9h.2 → ✅). Report PR. ``` --- ## W0·9d.3 — Stereographic layout S²→ℂ (port) · model: **Sonnet** ``` Use Sonnet. Repo as above, new branch off main `feat/9d3-stereographic`. Java PORT (phases.md §9d.3) closing the spherical-visualisation gap. Create code/include/stereographic_layout.hpp: stereographic projection S²→ℂ∪{∞} plus a Möbius-centering step, turning discrete_conformal_map_spherical()'s Point_3-on-S² output into a flat 2-D atlas. Java reference: unwrapper/StereographicUnwrapper.java (266 lines). Do NOT port math/CP1 or ComplexUtility.stereographic (redundant with std::complex + the existing MobiusMap — see porting-status.md). Validation: round-trip (project then inverse-project) to machine precision on sampled S² points; pole-handling unit case; run on the spherical pipeline output of a small genus-0 mesh and assert no flipped triangles (reuse 9g.1 FlippedTriangles if landed). Build + full CGAL suite green. Commit (Sonnet trailer), push, PR (`/test-cgal`). Update phase-orchestration.md (9d.3 → ✅). Report PR. Audit handoff note. ``` --- ## WA·Phase 12 — Decorated DCE & transition (RESEARCH, Chain A) · **two-step** ### Step 1 — Theorist + Spike · model: **Opus** ``` Use Opus. Repo as above. This is RESEARCH (no Java parent), Chain A — it reparametrises ALREADY-LANDED functionals, no genus-g dependency (phases.md §12). THEORIST: read Bobenko-Lutz 2025 "Decorated Discrete Conformal Equivalence in Non-Euclidean Geometries" (arXiv:2310.17529) §3 + Lutz 2024 thesis. Derive, on paper, the Penner-coordinate DECORATION layer: per-vertex circle/horocycle radius as a Penner coordinate, and its map to the existing inversive distance I_ij via the classical ℓ² = r_i² + r_j² + 2 r_i r_j η. Write the derivation to doc/math/decorated-dce-derivation.md (short LaTeX-style note). Define the validation strategy + acceptance criteria (below). SPIKE (branch `spike/phase12-decoration`, throwaway): a minimal numeric proof BEFORE any production code — (a) decoration round-trip I_ij ↔ (r_i, r_j, ℓ) at machine precision; (b) at background curvature κ=0, bit-for-bit match with the existing euclidean/inversive path; (c) the κ∈{+,0,−} transition driver holds the discrete conformal invariant fixed (GB per geometry; invariant constant across the transition to tol) — the numerical witness of the Bobenko-Lutz master theorem. Conclude GO or NO-GO with the evidence. If NO-GO, record it in research-track.md and stop. On GO, write the productionisation spec (files, public surface, test list) for Step 2. ``` ### Step 2 — Research Implementer + Validation · model: **Sonnet** (Opus review) ``` Use Sonnet. Repo as above, new branch off main `feat/phase12-decorated-dce`. Productionise the GO spike from Step 1 per its spec (doc/math/decorated-dce-derivation.md). Scope: (1) decoration layer (Penner coord ↔ I_ij); (2) transition driver (deform κ at fixed invariant, solve per geometry); (3) validation harness + example gallery. Reuse the shipped inversive-distance / hyper-ideal / spherical functionals — the decoration is a RE-PARAMETRISATION, not a new solver. Validation (research, no oracle — acceptance criteria from §12): round-trip machine precision; κ=0 bit-for-bit vs euclidean/inversive; GB per geometry; invariant constant across the κ-transition; one surface solved in all three backgrounds shares the invariant. Build + full CGAL suite green. Commit (Sonnet trailer), push, PR (`/test-cgal`). THEN run the review gate (Opus) below. Update phase-orchestration.md (Phase 12 → ✅) + references.md. Audit handoff note. ``` --- ## WB·9b-analytic — Analytic HyperIdeal Hessian via Schläfli (RESEARCH) · model: **Opus** ``` Use Opus. Repo as above, new branch off main `feat/9b-analytic-hessian`. RESEARCH (phases.md §9b-analytic) — replace the FD HyperIdeal Hessian with the closed form. THEORIST + IMPLEMENT: derive the analytic Hessian by explicit chain rule through (b_i, a_e) → ℓ_ij → ζ13/ζ14/ζ15 → α_ij / β_i. Sources: Springborn 2020 §4 + Schläfli 1858/60 + Rivin-Schlenker 1999 + Cho-Kim 1999 + Glickenstein 2011 §4. Write a short LaTeX correctness note to doc/math/hyperideal-hessian-derivation.md (extend the existing one). Implement as a new `hyper_ideal_hessian_analytic_sym(...)` next to the block-FD variant. Validation (research, FD cross-check): assert the analytic Hessian matches today's hyper_ideal_hessian_block_fd_sym entry-wise to FD tolerance on tetrahedron + the Lawson genus-2 mesh (off-equilibrium); PSD check; convergence parity with the existing solver; measured speed-up. Keep the block-FD as the cross-validation reference. Default solver path unchanged until parity is proven, then switch newton_hyper_ideal to the analytic Hessian behind the same interface. Build + full CGAL suite green (incl. all Lawson Java golden-vector tests — parity sacred). Commit (Opus trailer), push, PR (`/test-cgal`). Update phase-orchestration.md (9b-analytic → ✅) + references.md. Audit handoff note. ``` --- ## Reusable — Research spike go/no-go gate · model: **Opus** ``` Use Opus. Repo /Users/tarikmoussa/Desktop/ConformalLabpp, throwaway branch `spike/`. Goal: cheaply PROVE OR DISPROVE the math of BEFORE any production code. - Implement the smallest possible reference computation (scratch .cpp or a test-only TU). - Run the item's designed checks: analytic-limit match, invariant conservation (Gauss-Bonnet; holonomy closure ∏[a_i,b_i]=Id where relevant), FD-vs-analytic, and a small convergence-under-refinement probe. - If precision is suspect (genus-g isometry products), test with cpp_dec_float_50 too. Conclude with an explicit GO or NO-GO + the numeric evidence. On GO, output the productionisation spec (files, public surface, test list). On NO-GO, record the dead end in research-track.md. Do NOT touch library production code in this session. ``` ## Reusable — Math-review / validation gate · model: **Opus** ``` Use Opus. Review the open PR for as an independent reviewer: - Math: does the implementation match the derivation in doc/math/-derivation.md? Spot-check the chain rule / formula against the cited paper. - Validation: is the battery correct for the item TYPE (port→golden oracle; research→analytic-limit + invariant + convergence)? Are the tolerances honest? - Parity: no Java golden-vector test perturbed; defaults intact. - Precision: localized high-precision substrate where required, never in the Eigen core. - Public surface intentional + documented; commits attribute the model. Read `git diff main...HEAD` + the derivation note. Fix small issues inline; list precise required changes otherwise. Re-run the suite. Conclude APPROVE / CHANGES-REQUESTED, and mark the phase ✅ in phase-orchestration.md on approve. ``` --- ## ⏸ Chain B (genus g ≥ 2) — DAG-gated, do not start early Strict order, each ⏸ until its prereq is ✅: **holonomy-bug fix (+`cpp_dec_float_50`)** → **9c** (4g-gon fundamental domain) → **10a** (DEC layer + 1-forms) → **10b** (Siegel Ω) → **10c** (Fuchsian / H²/Γ) → **Phase 13** (canonical tessellations capstone). Land **Phase 12** first (Penner machinery reused). Each is a Theorist(Opus)→spike→implement→validate→review item; full literature in `phases.md` §9c/10/13 + `research-track.md`. The Orchestrator must refuse any item whose prerequisites are not all ✅. ## ⛔ Phase 8 (CGAL packaging) — blocked by G0 Do not start until the original authors grant porting/relicensing rights (G0; authors emailed, awaiting reply). Shared with the audit system's S6. ```