docs: integrate publication analysis — Alexa, Bobenko, Springborn, Crane, Lutz

Add phases 9d / 9e / 9f and literature citations derived from a systematic
review of the five authors' publication lists (Tier 1 / 2 / 3 analysis).

phases.md:
  - Phase 9d: ConesUtility port (9d.1) + non-Euclidean cone extensions
    (9d.2, RESEARCH) + StereographicUnwrapper (9d.3)
  - Phase 9e: CirclePatternLayout + CirclePatternUtility (Java port)
  - Phase 9f: Polygon Laplacian on non-triangular meshes (Alexa 2011/2020,
    RESEARCH — no Java equivalent)
  - Phase 9b-analytic: add Rivin-Springborn 1999 as Schläfli source
  - Phase 10b: add Bobenko-Bücking 2009 + Bobenko-Lutz 2024 IMRN
  - Phase 10c: add Lutz 2023 (canonical tessellations) + Bobenko-Lutz 2024
  - Phase 10c' KoebePolyhedron: add Bowers-Bowers-Lutz 2026 rigidity result

references.md:
  - Crane et al. 2018 Optimal Cone Singularities (Phase 9d.2)
  - Bobenko-Lutz 2025 Discrete & Comput. Geom. (Phase 9d.2)
  - Bobenko-Lutz 2024 IMRN (Phase 10b/c)
  - Lutz 2023 Geom. Dedicata (Phase 10c)
  - Lutz PhD thesis TU Berlin 2024 (Phases 9d.2, 10b, 10c)
  - Bowers-Bowers-Lutz 2026 (Phase 9b-analytic + 10c')
  - Alexa-Wardetzky 2011 + Alexa 2020 (Phase 9f)
  - Bobenko-Bücking 2009 (Phase 10b)
  - Rivin-Springborn 1999 (Phase 9b-analytic)

research-track.md:
  - New entry: Phase 9d.2 non-Euclidean cone extensions (Bobenko-Lutz 2025
    + Crane 2018), with acceptance criteria
  - New entry: Phase 9f polygon Laplacian (Alexa-Wardetzky 2011 / Alexa 2020),
    with acceptance criteria

java-parity.md:
  - Split cone-metrics row into Euclidean (9d.1 port) and non-Euclidean
    (9d.2 research) with literature references
  - Add ConesUtility to "utility classes not yet ported" table

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tarik Moussa
2026-05-25 23:51:26 +02:00
parent f25174ed69
commit 068df474b1
4 changed files with 167 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@@ -22,7 +22,8 @@ as the reference implementation for expected behaviour, edge cases, and test cas
| HyperIdeal Hessian — analytic via ζ → l → β/α | ❌ *(`hasHessian()==false`)* | ⚠️ FD (Phase 4a) → block-FD (Phase 9b) | **Java has NO Hessian for HyperIdeal** (verified: `HyperIdealFunctional.java:295-298` declares `hasHessian() { return false; }`). Both C++ Hessian variants are **new research beyond Java**; analytic Schläfli-based variant is Phase 9b-analytic. |
| Newton solver | ✅ | ✅ | |
| SparseQR fallback for gauge modes | unknown | ✅ | New in C++ |
| Cone metrics — prescribed Θᵥ ≠ 2π | ✅ fully | ⚠️ data structure only | |
| Cone metrics — prescribed Θᵥ ≠ 2π (Euclidean) | ✅ fully | ❌ Phase 9d.1 (port) | Java Euclidean-only; `ConesUtility.java` ~200 lines |
| Cone metrics — non-Euclidean (HyperIdeal / Spherical) | ❌ *(not in Java)* | ❌ Phase 9d.2 (research) | **No Java source.** Mathematical basis: Bobenko-Lutz 2025 (decorated DCE) + Crane et al. 2018 (optimal cone placement). |
| Layout / embedding — ℝ² / H² / S² | ✅ | ✅ priority-BFS all three | |
| Exact hyperbolic trilateration | ✅ Möbius | ✅ Möbius + law of cosines | |
| halfedge_uv — seam-aware UV (texture atlas) | ✅ | ✅ | |
@@ -49,6 +50,7 @@ They are candidates for Phase 9 or Phase 10.
| Java class | Description | Phase |
|---|---|---|
| `ConesUtility` (~200 lines) | Prescribed cone angles Θᵥ ≠ 2π — Euclidean mode only | 9d.1 |
| `CPEuclideanFunctional` | Face-based circle-packing energy (BPS 2010) | 9a.1 |
| `FundamentalPolygonUtility` (698 lines) | Construction + canonicalisation of 4g-gons for genus-g | 9c |
| `CanonicalFormUtility` (532 lines) | High-level wrapper for 9c — drives canonicalisation pipeline | 9c |