docs(reviewer): anonymise reviewer references; profile-based framing

Replaces the "Springborn / Bobenko alumnus" placeholder in the reviewer
materials (briefing, questions, agenda, README) and in
locked-vs-flexible.md with a research-profile description:

  active researcher in the decorated-DCE / Penner-coordinates /
  canonical-tessellations / hyperideal-polyhedra line, treated as a
  peer most likely to USE conformallab++ as numerical infrastructure
  for their own future experiments — not merely to evaluate it.

Citations to the published literature (Springborn 2020 paper, etc.)
remain untouched.  Only personal references to the prospective
reviewer were anonymised.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tarik Moussa
2026-05-26 00:19:30 +02:00
parent 8daee1bb21
commit 1eff8c6bce
5 changed files with 28 additions and 15 deletions

View File

@@ -30,9 +30,9 @@ We can either:
Down-side: longer; potential for new bugs not seen by the Java
original's test cases.
**Question**: which route do you prefer, and is there a Springborn-era
reference implementation (Mathematica notebook, paper appendix) we
should cross-validate against?
**Question**: which route do you prefer, and is there a reference
implementation (Mathematica notebook, paper appendix, other research
codebase) we should cross-validate against?
Context: `doc/roadmap/phases.md` §Phase 9c, `doc/roadmap/porting-status.md`.