docs: citation audit + correct 8 mis-citations; add Phases 12/13
Some checks failed
C++ Tests / test-fast (pull_request) Successful in 1m55s
API Docs / doc-build (pull_request) Successful in 53s
Markdown link check / check (pull_request) Successful in 50s
C++ Tests / test-cgal (pull_request) Has been skipped
C++ Tests / quality-gates (pull_request) Failing after 1m56s

External reviewer pass over the literature references. Verified entries
against arXiv/DOI/publisher and corrected misattributions that had
propagated across the docs.

Corrected citations (consistent across all docs):
- Bowers-Bowers-Lutz 2026: title was the 2017 paper's
  -> "Rigidity of Koebe Polyhedra and Inversive Distance Circle Packings"
- Liouville theorem: "Springborn 2019" -> Pinkall & Springborn,
  Geom. Dedicata 214 (2021)
- Bobenko-Pinkall-Springborn: "G&T 14 (2010)" -> G&T 19(4) (2015), 2155-2215
- Optimal Cone Singularities: "Crane, Soliman, Ben-Chen, Schroeder"
  -> Soliman, Slepcev, Crane, ACM TOG 37(4)
- Schlaefli formula: "Rivin, Springborn 1999" -> Rivin, Schlenker
- Quasiconformal distortion: "Springborn, Veselov" -> Born, Buecking,
  Springborn (arXiv:1505.01341)
- Period matrices: "Bobenko, Buecking 2009" (was Bobenko-Mercat-Schmies'
  title) -> Bobenko-Mercat-Schmies 2011 + genuine Bobenko-Buecking 2021
- Fabricated entry: "Alexa 2020, DOI 10.1145/3414685.3417840" pointed to
  an unrelated paper (Pixelor) -> Bunge, Herholz, Kazhdan, Botsch 2020
- Stripe Patterns: "Bonneel et al. 2015" -> Knoeppel, Crane, Pinkall,
  Schroeder 2015

Equation-number corrections (verified against the PDFs):
- Glickenstein 2011 "eq. 4.6" -> "§5.2" (no such equation label exists)
- Springborn 2020 "eq. 4.6" -> "§4 variational gradient"
- inversive-distance attribution softened to classical inversive distance

Other:
- DBFEnergy bibliography (separate repo) and convergence half-sentence in
  novelty-statement.md §3.3 (Bobenko-Buecking 2021)
- Status legend (implemented vs planned) at top of references.md
- New Phase 12 (decorated DCE & geometric transition, Chain A, near-term)
  and Phase 13 (canonical tessellations & polyhedral realisation, Chain B
  capstone) in phases.md + research-track.md; 10c scope-boundary note
  clarifying infrastructure vs Lutz-specific algorithms

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Tarik Moussa
2026-05-29 19:17:17 +02:00
parent 18b9c61492
commit 26f4f0637d
11 changed files with 274 additions and 70 deletions

View File

@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@ energy-evaluation cost and the FD-gradient validation pattern.
### 2.5 Hessian — finite difference for now
Glickenstein 2011 eq. (4.6) gives an analytic Hessian for the inversive-
Glickenstein 2011 §5.2 gives an analytic Hessian for the inversive-
distance variational principle, but is more involved than the Springborn
cot-Laplacian. For MVP we rely on FD; the analytic form is a future
optimisation (joining the Phase 9b roadmap for HyperIdeal as a sibling
@@ -173,7 +173,7 @@ same Newton-time-zero gradient".
| Angles | half-tangent law of cosines | (face-internal angles via `p(θ*, Δρ)`) | half-tangent law of cosines (reuses `euclidean_angles`) |
| Gradient | `Θ_v Σ α_v(f)` | `φ_f Σ_{h:face(h)=f} (p+θ*)` | `Θ_v Σ α_v(f)` |
| Energy form | path integral (10-pt GL) | closed form via `½ p Δρ + Λ(θ*+p) θ* ρ` | path integral (10-pt GL) |
| Hessian | analytic (cotangent Laplacian) | analytic (`sin θ / (cosh Δρ cos θ)`) | finite difference (analytic deferred — Glickenstein 2011 eq. 4.6) |
| Hessian | analytic (cotangent Laplacian) | analytic (`sin θ / (cosh Δρ cos θ)`) | finite difference (analytic deferred — Glickenstein 2011 §5.2) |
| Convexity | strictly convex after gauge fix | strictly convex after gauge fix | locally convex on triangle-inequality domain (Luo 2004 Thm 1.2) |
| Gauge fix | pin one vertex (`v_idx = 1`) | pin one face (`f_idx = 1`) | pin one vertex (`v_idx = 1`) |
@@ -213,8 +213,9 @@ form. It does share the Clausen function via `clausen2()` from `clausen.hpp`.
## 6. References
- Bobenko, A. I., Pinkall, U. & Springborn, B. (2010). *Discrete conformal
maps and ideal hyperbolic polyhedra.* Geometry & Topology 14, 379426.
- Bobenko, A. I., Pinkall, U. & Springborn, B. *Discrete conformal
maps and ideal hyperbolic polyhedra.* Geometry & Topology 19(4) (2015),
21552215. arXiv:1005.2698.
- Bowers, P. L. & Stephenson, K. (2004). *Uniformizing dessins and Belyĭ
maps via circle packing.* Memoirs of the AMS 170(805).
- Glickenstein, D. (2011). *Discrete conformal variations and scalar