feat: output_uv_map for InversiveDistance, error for CP-Euclidean, reviewer trio

Three reviewer-meeting deliverables in one commit.

(1) output_uv_map for the two remaining DCE entries
    ─────────────────────────────────────────────────
    * Discrete_inversive_distance.h: full implementation.  After Newton,
      reconstruct effective Euclidean edge lengths from the converged
      log-radii via the Bowers-Stephenson identity
      `ℓᵢⱼ² = rᵢ² + rⱼ² + 2·Iᵢⱼ·rᵢ·rⱼ`, populate a temporary
      EuclideanMaps with `lambda0 = log(ℓᵢⱼ²)`, and reuse the existing
      `euclidean_layout(mesh, 0, eucl)` priority-BFS.  Per-vertex
      Point_2 coordinates written into the user-supplied pmap.
      Optional `normalise_layout(true)` applies the canonical PCA
      centroid + major-axis rotation, same as the other 3 entries.

    * Discrete_circle_packing.h: throws std::runtime_error with a
      clear pointer to Phase 9c rather than silently producing
      nonsense.  CP-Euclidean is face-based; the faithful output is a
      per-face circle packing in ℝ², not a per-vertex Point_2 map.
      A true layout requires BPS-2010 §6 (~150 lines, on the porting
      roadmap as Phase 9c).  Failing loudly is the honest default.

    Tests: 2 new cases in test_cgal_phase8b_lite.cpp
    (OutputUvMap_InversiveDistance_PopulatesPmap;
    OutputUvMap_CPEuclidean_ThrowsClearly).  Both green.
    Suite total now 259 (was 257, +2).  CGAL subtotal: 234 → 236.

(2) Reviewer meeting documents
    ──────────────────────────
    New directory doc/reviewer/ with three files:

    * briefing.md  — one-page orientation for the reviewer.
      What the project is, where to look first
      (https://tmoussa.codeberg.page/ConformalLabpp/), the headline
      evidence (tests/coverage/sanitizers/license), what we want from
      them, what's deferred and why, and the 5 questions in a separate
      file.

    * questions.md — the 5 concrete decisions we want their second
      opinion on:
        Q1 Phase 9c (port-literal vs re-derive)
        Q2 Phase 9b-analytic (worth ~2 weeks for ~6× speedup?)
        Q3 CP-Euclidean output_uv_map (build now or defer?)
        Q4 CGAL submission strategy (one package or five?)
        Q5 geometry-central cross-validation co-authorship
      Plus an explicit "what would you say no to?" question at the
      bottom — negative feedback is the highest-value information.

    * agenda.md   — my own internal playbook (NOT to be sent).
      60-min flow: 5-min thank-you, 10-min architecture tour,
      30-min for Q1-Q5 in the order Q4-Q1-Q2-Q5-Q3, 5-min "no"
      question, 5-min wrap-up.  Includes post-meeting memo template
      to fill out in the 30 min after.

    * README.md    — index for the directory; says which file goes
      to whom and when to send.

(3) locked-vs-flexible.md known-limitations update
    ─────────────────────────────────────────────
    "output_uv_map covers 3 of 5 entries" → "covers 4 of 5".
    CP-Euclidean's throws-clearly behaviour documented as a Phase 9c
    deliverable rather than a passive gap.

Bonus: extended .codespellrc ignore list (acknowledgement, the
British-English spelling I used in agenda.md).

Verifications on this commit:
  259/259 tests pass (0 skipped)
  scripts/check-test-counts.sh:                OK (23 + 236 = 259)
  scripts/quality/license-headers.sh:          OK (66/66 SPDX)
  python3 scripts/quality/cgal-conventions.py: OK (0/6 violations)
  scripts/quality/codespell.sh:                OK (0 typos)
  scripts/quality/shellcheck.sh:               OK (0 findings)
  python3 scripts/check-markdown-links.py:     OK (143/143)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>

code/tests/cgal/test_cgal_phase8b_lite.cpp

@@ -288,6 +288,60 @@ TEST(CGALPhase8bLite, OutputUvMap_HyperIdeal_PointsInPoincareDisk)
     //  No assertion needed; this is documented behaviour.)
 }
 
+TEST(CGALPhase8bLite, OutputUvMap_InversiveDistance_PopulatesPmap)
+{
+    // Inversive-Distance: per-vertex u_i = log r_i.  With output_uv_map
+    // the entry function reconstructs effective Euclidean edge lengths via
+    // the Bowers-Stephenson identity and reuses the euclidean_layout
+    // priority-BFS to populate per-vertex Point_2 coordinates.
+    using K = CGAL::Simple_cartesian<double>;
+    auto mesh = make_quad_strip();
+
+    auto uv_map = mesh.add_property_map<Vertex_index, K::Point_2>(
+        "v:test_uv_id", K::Point_2(0, 0)).first;
+
+    auto res = CGAL::discrete_inversive_distance_map(
+        mesh, CGAL::parameters::output_uv_map(uv_map));
+
+    ASSERT_TRUE(res.converged) << "ID Newton did not converge on quad_strip";
+    EXPECT_EQ(res.u_per_vertex.size(), num_vertices(mesh));
+    // Every UV must be finite; not all zero.
+    bool any_nonzero = false;
+    for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
+        const auto& p = uv_map[v];
+        ASSERT_TRUE(std::isfinite(p.x()));
+        ASSERT_TRUE(std::isfinite(p.y()));
+        if (std::abs(p.x()) > 1e-9 || std::abs(p.y()) > 1e-9) any_nonzero = true;
+    }
+    EXPECT_TRUE(any_nonzero) << "all UVs are zero — layout did not run";
+}
+
+TEST(CGALPhase8bLite, OutputUvMap_CPEuclidean_ThrowsClearly)
+{
+    // CP-Euclidean is face-based; its natural layout is a per-face
+    // circle packing in ℝ², not a per-vertex Point_2 map.  The entry
+    // throws std::runtime_error with a helpful message rather than
+    // silently producing nonsense.  See doc/architecture/locked-vs-flexible.md.
+    using K = CGAL::Simple_cartesian<double>;
+    auto mesh = make_quad_strip();
+
+    auto uv_map = mesh.add_property_map<Vertex_index, K::Point_2>(
+        "v:test_uv_cp", K::Point_2(0, 0)).first;
+
+    EXPECT_THROW(
+        CGAL::discrete_circle_packing_euclidean(
+            mesh, CGAL::parameters::output_uv_map(uv_map)),
+        std::runtime_error)
+        << "expected discrete_circle_packing_euclidean to reject "
+           "`output_uv_map(...)` (face-based DOF, Phase 9c).";
+
+    // Sanity: without output_uv_map the entry function still works fine.
+    auto res = CGAL::discrete_circle_packing_euclidean(mesh);
+    // Convergence depends on the mesh; we only check no-throw + a sane
+    // shape of the result struct.
+    EXPECT_EQ(res.rho_per_face.size(), num_faces(mesh));
+}
+
 TEST(CGALPhase8bLite, OutputUvMap_Absent_DoesNotRunLayout)
 {
     // Sanity: without the parameter, no layout work happens.  Verified