a3ee9576d4
All checks were successful
C++ Tests / test-fast (pull_request) Successful in 1m57s
API Docs / doc-build (pull_request) Successful in 1m3s
Markdown link check / check (pull_request) Successful in 44s
C++ Tests / test-cgal (pull_request) Has been skipped
C++ Tests / quality-gates (pull_request) Successful in 2m11s
Bundles the 2026-05-29 Java↔C++ math-correctness audit (doc/reviewer/ java-port-audit.md, 11 findings) with two follow-up fixes. Audit code changes: - Finding 3 (spherical_functional): edge-DOF replacement parameterization via spher_eff_lambda; edge gradient α_opp⁺+α_opp⁻−θ_e (drops additive −(S⁺+S⁻)/2) - Finding 4 (spherical_hessian): always-compiled edge-DOF throw guard - Finding 6 (period_matrix): faithful normalizeModulus (0≤Re≤½, Im≥0, |τ|≥1) - Finding 9 (inversive_distance): degenerate-face limiting angles, no skip - Findings 1/2 (euclidean): degenerate gradient limiting angles + Hessian guard Euclidean holonomy/τ fix: develop the cut surface across the dual spanning tree only (cut_graph now exposes is_dual_tree), so genus-1 cut edges yield non-degenerate lattice generators. Previously τ came out 0 / NaN / 1e13 on the bundled tori; now matches the analytic revolution modulus i·√(R²−r²)/r. Re-enabled τ reporting in the Euclidean CLI; rewrote validation.md §3/§4 accordingly. Tests (240 CGAL, 0 skipped): - HolonomyEndToEnd ×3 — tori of revolution (4×4, hex 6×6, 8×8) vs analytic modulus - SphericalFunctional.EdgeGradient_RegularTetClosedForm — independent closed-form π/3 oracle locking the Finding-3 edge formula (the path-integral FD check cannot detect a wrong-but-conservative gradient) Also documents the latent spherical/hyperbolic holonomy-extraction bug (same single-development pattern, dead code today) in research-track.md (Phase 9c/10), and adds favour/normalisations to the codespell ignore list. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Reviewer meeting materials
A single landing page for the three documents associated with an external-reviewer meeting. The materials are written for a peer who actively publishes in discrete differential geometry — specifically the decorated-DCE / Penner-coordinates / hyperideal-polyhedra / canonical-tessellations research line — and who would potentially use conformallab++ as numerical infrastructure for their own future experiments.
| Document | Audience | Purpose |
|---|---|---|
briefing.md |
the reviewer | one-page orientation: what the project is, where to look first, what we want from them |
questions.md |
the reviewer | the 5 concrete decisions we want their opinion on (skim before the meeting) |
agenda.md |
me | my own meeting playbook: timing, order, the "no" question, post-meeting memo template |
After the meeting, a fourth file 2026-XX-XX-meeting-notes.md should
land here too — the memo template at the bottom of agenda.md is the
suggested structure.
When to send to the reviewer
- briefing.md + questions.md: as part of the meeting-confirmation email, ~5 business days before the meeting. Subject line: "Pre-read for our conformallab++ chat (~15 min)".
- agenda.md: never send. This is internal scaffolding.
Hub-Page durability
The reviewer hub HTML at https://tmoussa.codeberg.page/ConformalLabpp/
is published from doc/reviewer/hub.html in the repo (not from a
detached preview branch). This means:
- Merging any of the open PRs into
maintriggers.gitea/workflows/doxygen-pages.ymlwhich republishes the hub alongside fresh Doxygen HTML — the reviewer URL stays live across merges with no manual intervention. - The hub is source-controlled, so changes are reviewable via PR like any other doc, and old versions live in git history.
- The original Doxygen index moves to
/doxygen.htmlwhenever the hub override is active; both are reachable from the hub itself.
Quick links the reviewer should bookmark
- 🌐 Reviewer-hub landing page: https://tmoussa.codeberg.page/ConformalLabpp/ (the hub shows status badges, a "what's new" banner with the most recent delta, the research-alignment table, and direct links into every document below)
- 📦 Source: https://codeberg.org/TMoussa/ConformalLabpp
- 📝 Architecture decisions (incl. the Q7 "no" prompt):
../architecture/locked-vs-flexible.md - 📐 Schläfli derivation (for Q3):
../math/hyperideal-hessian-derivation.md - 📚 Literature index (for Q1 + Q3):
../math/references.md - 🗺️ Per-phase roadmap (for Q1):
../roadmap/phases.md - 🧪 Research-track entries with acceptance criteria (Q1 + Q2):
../roadmap/research-track.md