Files
ConformalLabpp/doc/reviewer
Tarik Moussa b213ad2265
All checks were successful
C++ Tests / test-fast (pull_request) Successful in 2m23s
C++ Tests / quality-gates (pull_request) Has been skipped
C++ Tests / test-cgal (pull_request) Has been skipped
docs(reviewer): add math-derivation & citation audit
Checks code/docs against the published mathematics (vs java-port-audit which
checks code vs Java):
- M1: Kolpakov-Mednykh volume formula used in code but missing from references.md
- M2: BPS circle-packing paper cited as '2010' in code vs '2015' in references.md
- M3: post-2023/preprint citations back unimplemented phases — re-verify + clarify
  scope before submission
- M4: no canonical citation-key convention
- M5: large derivations numerically validated but prose unreviewed — expert sign-off

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 10:21:24 +02:00
..

Reviewer meeting materials

A single landing page for the three documents associated with an external-reviewer meeting. The materials are written for a peer who actively publishes in discrete differential geometry — specifically the decorated-DCE / Penner-coordinates / hyperideal-polyhedra / canonical-tessellations research line — and who would potentially use conformallab++ as numerical infrastructure for their own future experiments.

Document Audience Purpose
briefing.md the reviewer one-page orientation: what the project is, where to look first, what we want from them
questions.md the reviewer the 5 concrete decisions we want their opinion on (skim before the meeting)
agenda.md me my own meeting playbook: timing, order, the "no" question, post-meeting memo template

After the meeting, a fourth file 2026-XX-XX-meeting-notes.md should land here too — the memo template at the bottom of agenda.md is the suggested structure.

When to send to the reviewer

  • briefing.md + questions.md: as part of the meeting-confirmation email, ~5 business days before the meeting. Subject line: "Pre-read for our conformallab++ chat (~15 min)".
  • agenda.md: never send. This is internal scaffolding.

Hub-Page durability

The reviewer hub HTML at https://tmoussa.codeberg.page/ConformalLabpp/ is published from doc/reviewer/hub.html in the repo (not from a detached preview branch). This means:

  • Merging any of the open PRs into main triggers .gitea/workflows/doxygen-pages.yml which republishes the hub alongside fresh Doxygen HTML — the reviewer URL stays live across merges with no manual intervention.
  • The hub is source-controlled, so changes are reviewable via PR like any other doc, and old versions live in git history.
  • The original Doxygen index moves to /doxygen.html whenever the hub override is active; both are reachable from the hub itself.