Files
ConformalLabpp/code/tests/cgal/test_euclidean_functional.cpp
Tarik Moussa cfbbc1b21f fix(dof-assign): correct "pin before" docs + add gauge-vertex overloads
Finding-D from doc/reviewer/external-audit-2026-05-30.md.

All three DOF-assignment functions iterated over every vertex
unconditionally, overwriting any v_idx set before the call.  The
documentation said "pin before OR after" — the "before" option was
silently wrong (the pin would be overwritten).  For the
inversive-distance variant the doc explicitly said the pre-call pin
would make the function "a no-op for that vertex", which was false.

Changes (three headers):
- euclidean_functional.hpp  assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices()
- spherical_functional.hpp  assign_vertex_dof_indices()
- inversive_distance_functional.hpp  assign_inversive_distance_vertex_dof_indices()

For each:
  1. Single-arg overload: doc corrected to "pin AFTER, not before;
     pre-call pins are overwritten"
  2. New two-arg overload accepting a Vertex_index gauge: pins the
     requested vertex (v_idx=-1) in a single pass, preventing the
     user error entirely

Three new GTests in test_euclidean_functional.cpp:
  SingleArg_PinBeforeHasNoEffect        — documents the old pitfall
  TwoArg_GaugeIsPinnedOthersAreSequential — verifies the new overload
  TwoArg_NewtonConvergesWithGaugeOverload — end-to-end correctness

266/266 CGAL tests pass, 0 failed.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-31 01:17:27 +02:00

732 lines
37 KiB
C++
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters

This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.

// Copyright (c) 2024-2026 Tarik Moussa.
// SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT
// test_euclidean_functional.cpp
//
// Phase 3d — EuclideanCyclicFunctional ported to ConformalMesh.
//
// Corresponds to de.varylab.discreteconformal.functional.EuclideanCyclicFunctionalTest.
//
// Test map (Java → C++)
// ──────────────────────
// testHessian (Ignored) → GradientCheck_Hessian (ported)
// testGradient…Triangle → GradientCheck_TriangleVertex (ported)
// testGradient…QuadStrip → GradientCheck_QuadStripVertex (ported)
// testGradient…Tetrahedron → GradientCheck_TetrahedronVertex (ported)
// testGradient…AllDofs → GradientCheck_TetrahedronAllDofs (ported)
// testFunctionalAtNaNValue → AnglesFiniteAtKnownPoint (ported)
//
// Energy model
// ────────────
// Uses the Schläfli path integral E(x) = ∫₀¹⟨G(tx),x⟩dt (10-point GL).
// The gradient check verifies G is curl-free.
#include "conformal_mesh.hpp"
#include "mesh_builder.hpp"
#include "euclidean_geometry.hpp"
#include "euclidean_functional.hpp"
#include "euclidean_hessian.hpp"
#include "clausen.hpp"
#include "mesh_io.hpp"
#include "newton_solver.hpp"
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <cmath>
#include <vector>
#include <string>
using namespace conformallab;
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Cross-module Hessian check: euclidean_gradient() ↔ euclidean_hessian()
//
// Java @Ignore reason: "no Hessian implemented yet" — the Java functional
// test was written before the Hessian existed. In C++ the analytic
// cotangent-Laplace Hessian (euclidean_hessian.hpp, Phase 3f) is complete.
//
// This test verifies cross-module consistency:
// H[i,j] ≈ (G_i(x+ε·eⱼ) G_i(xε·eⱼ)) / (2ε)
// using the gradient from euclidean_functional.hpp and the Hessian from
// euclidean_hessian.hpp. A bug in DOF-index mapping or sign convention
// that affects both modules independently would only be caught here.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_Hessian)
{
auto mesh = make_triangle();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -0.1);
// hessian_check_euclidean: H[i,j] ≈ FD(G)[i,j] using euclidean_gradient()
EXPECT_TRUE(hessian_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Cross-module: euclidean_gradient() and euclidean_hessian() are inconsistent";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Angle formula: equilateral triangle → all angles = π/3
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, EquilateralTriangleAnglesArePiOver3)
{
// All sides equal: l = 1.0, log-length = 0.
auto fa = euclidean_angles(0.0, 0.0, 0.0);
ASSERT_TRUE(fa.valid) << "Equilateral triangle must be valid";
constexpr double PI_3 = 3.14159265358979323846 / 3.0;
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha1, PI_3, 1e-12);
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha2, PI_3, 1e-12);
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha3, PI_3, 1e-12);
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Angle formula: right isosceles triangle (legs 1, hypotenuse √2)
//
// For the 45-45-90 triangle: angles are π/4, π/4, π/2.
// From make_triangle default (v0=(0,0), v1=(1,0), v2=(0,1)):
// e01: l=1, λ°=0
// e12: l=√2, λ°=log(2)
// e02: l=1, λ°=0
// Angle at v0 (opposite e12) = π/2.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, RightIsoscelesTriangleAnglesCorrect)
{
const double log2 = std::log(2.0);
// lam12 = 0 (v0-v1, length 1), lam23 = log(2) (v1-v2, length √2), lam31 = 0 (v2-v0, length 1)
// v1 = v0 in our ordering → remap: l01=1, l12=√2, l20=1
// Using euclidean_angles(lam_v1v2, lam_v2v3, lam_v3v1):
// v1=(0,0), v2=(1,0), v3=(0,1)
// lam12 = log(1²) = 0, lam23 = log(√2 ²) = log2, lam31 = log(1²) = 0
auto fa = euclidean_angles(0.0, log2, 0.0);
ASSERT_TRUE(fa.valid);
constexpr double PI = 3.14159265358979323846;
// v1=(0,0) is at the right-angle corner (opposite the hypotenuse l23=√2) → α1 = 90°.
// v2=(1,0) and v3=(0,1) are the 45° corners (each opposite a leg of length 1).
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha1, PI / 2.0, 1e-12); // angle at v1 (opposite l23=√2): 90°
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha2, PI / 4.0, 1e-12); // angle at v2 (opposite l31=1): 45°
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha3, PI / 4.0, 1e-12); // angle at v3 (opposite l12=1): 45°
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Angle sum = π for any valid Euclidean triangle
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, AngleSumEqualsPi)
{
// Scalene triangle with log-lengths (0, 0.5, -0.3).
auto fa = euclidean_angles(0.0, 0.5, -0.3);
ASSERT_TRUE(fa.valid);
constexpr double PI = 3.14159265358979323846;
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha1 + fa.alpha2 + fa.alpha3, PI, 1e-12);
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Degenerate triangle → valid = false
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, DegenerateTriangleReturnsFalse)
{
// l12 = l23 = 1, l31 = 3 → violates triangle inequality.
auto fa = euclidean_angles_from_lengths(1.0, 1.0, 3.0);
EXPECT_FALSE(fa.valid);
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: default right-isosceles triangle, vertex DOFs only
//
// Mirrors Java testGradient…SingleTriangle.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_TriangleVertex)
{
auto mesh = make_triangle(); // (0,0)(1,0)(0,1)
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
// Small uniform conformal perturbation.
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -0.1);
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed on right-isosceles triangle (vertex DOFs)";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: quad strip (2 triangles, 1 interior edge), vertex DOFs only
//
// Mirrors Java testGradient…QuadStrip / testGradientInExtendedDomain.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_QuadStripVertex)
{
auto mesh = make_quad_strip();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -0.2);
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed on quad strip (vertex DOFs)";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: regular tetrahedron, vertex DOFs only
//
// Closed surface (4 faces, 4 vertices, 6 interior edges).
// Exercises per-vertex angle-sum accumulation on multiple faces.
// Mirrors Java testGradient…Tetrahedron / testGradientWithHyperIdeal…
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_TetrahedronVertex)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -0.15);
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed on regular tetrahedron (vertex DOFs)";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: tetrahedron, all DOFs (vertex + edge)
//
// Exercises the edge-gradient branch G_e = α_opp⁺ + α_opp⁻ π.
// Mirrors Java testGradientWithHyperellipticCurve.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_TetrahedronAllDofs)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_all_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
// 4 vertex DOFs + 6 edge DOFs = 10 total.
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
// Set vertex DOFs slightly negative to keep triangles non-degenerate.
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i)
x[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] = -0.15;
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed on regular tetrahedron (all DOFs)";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Angles are finite at a known interior point
//
// Mirrors Java testFunctionalAtNaNValue: stress-test the angle formula with
// large negative conformal factors (compressed triangle) to ensure no NaN/Inf.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, AnglesFiniteAtKnownPoint)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
// Very compressed: u_i = -3 (all sides shrunk by exp(-3) ≈ 0.05).
// Triangle stays well-formed (equilateral shrinks uniformly).
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -3.0);
auto G = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x, maps);
for (std::size_t i = 0; i < G.size(); ++i) {
EXPECT_FALSE(std::isnan(G[i])) << "Gradient component " << i << " is NaN";
EXPECT_FALSE(std::isinf(G[i])) << "Gradient component " << i << " is Inf";
}
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: fan of 5 flat triangles, vertex DOFs only
//
// High-valence central vertex: exercises per-vertex angle accumulation
// across 5 incident faces.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_Fan5Vertex)
{
auto mesh = make_fan(5);
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), -0.05);
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed on flat fan-5 mesh";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Gradient check: mixed pinned/variable vertices
//
// Pins the first vertex (u_v0 = 0 fixed), lets the rest be variable.
// Verifies that the gradient accumulator skips pinned vertices correctly.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, GradientCheck_MixedPinnedVertices)
{
auto mesh = make_quad_strip();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
// Manually pin v0; assign v1, v2, v3 as DOFs 0, 1, 2.
auto vit = mesh.vertices().begin();
Vertex_index v0 = *vit++;
Vertex_index v1 = *vit++;
Vertex_index v2 = *vit++;
Vertex_index v3 = *vit;
maps.v_idx[v0] = -1; // pinned
maps.v_idx[v1] = 0;
maps.v_idx[v2] = 1;
maps.v_idx[v3] = 2;
std::vector<double> x = {-0.1, -0.3, -0.2};
EXPECT_TRUE(gradient_check_euclidean(mesh, x, maps))
<< "Gradient check failed for mixed pinned/variable vertices";
}
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// Golden-value oracle — pin the Euclidean angle formula and the 2·Л(α) energy
// term bit-for-bit against the upstream Java reference (EuclideanCyclicFunctional
// .triangleEnergyAndAlphas, lines 341-361), captured by running the compiled Java
// library (openjdk 17) with the real de.varylab…Clausen.Л on these exact edge
// lengths. Companion to HyperIdealGoldenJava and SphericalGoldenJava: locks the
// absolute angle/energy values against an independent implementation, catching
// silent index/sign drift the curl-free path-integral gradient check cannot see.
//
// To regenerate: /tmp/oracle/EucOracle.java. Values are Java printf %.17g.
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
TEST(EuclideanGoldenJava, AngleAndLobachevskyEnergyFromLengths)
{
auto check = [](double l12, double l23, double l31,
double a1_g, double a2_g, double a3_g, double L_g) {
auto fa = euclidean_angles_from_lengths(l12, l23, l31);
EXPECT_TRUE(fa.valid);
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha1, a1_g, 1e-12);
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha2, a2_g, 1e-12);
EXPECT_NEAR(fa.alpha3, a3_g, 1e-12);
const double Lterm = 2.0 * Lobachevsky(fa.alpha1)
+ 2.0 * Lobachevsky(fa.alpha2)
+ 2.0 * Lobachevsky(fa.alpha3);
EXPECT_NEAR(Lterm, L_g, 1e-12);
};
check(1.0, 1.2, 0.9,
1.3637649752769678, 0.82416964552030680, 0.95365803279251860,
1.9456273836230942);
check(1.0, 1.0, 1.0,
1.0471975511965979, 1.0471975511965979, 1.0471975511965979,
2.0298832128193070);
}
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
// FULL-MESH golden oracle — the strongest cross-check: drives the REAL upstream
// EuclideanCyclicFunctional (openjdk 17) on a tetrahedron loaded from a shared
// OBJ (identical topology + geometry to make_tetrahedron()), and pins BOTH the
// per-vertex gradient G_v = Θ_v Σα AND the energy difference ΔE = E(x) E(0)
// bit-for-bit against it.
//
// This closes audit missing-test item 5 (full-mesh energy + gradient at a known
// x). It is genuinely independent of the C++ implementation in two ways:
// • the gradient is the upstream library's own analytic gradient (not an FD
// check, which only proves curl-freeness of the C++ self-consistent energy);
// • the energy is Java's CLOSED-FORM functional value, whereas C++ computes it
// as a Gauss-Legendre PATH INTEGRAL of its gradient — two different methods
// that must agree on ΔE (the initialEnergy constant and the φ·λ⁰ term cancel
// in the difference, and there are no edge DOFs here).
//
// Setup parity (verified against UnwrapUtility.prepareInvariantDataEuclidean):
// closed mesh, ALL 4 vertices variable (no pin), Θ_v = 2π, no edge DOFs,
// λ°_e = 2·log(|p_i p_j|), per-vertex u(P) = 0.10·X 0.07·Y + 0.13·Z.
//
// To regenerate: /tmp/oracle/{tet.obj,EucMeshOracle.java}. Values are Java %.17g.
// ─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
TEST(EuclideanGoldenJava, FullMeshGradientAndEnergy_Tetrahedron)
{
constexpr double TWO_PI = 2.0 * 3.14159265358979323846264338328;
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron(); // same 4 vertices as /tmp/oracle/tet.obj
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
// All four vertices are DOFs (Java prepareInvariantData makes every interior
// vertex variable on a closed mesh); Θ_v = 2π; no edge DOFs.
int idx = 0;
for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
maps.v_idx[v] = idx++;
maps.theta_v[v] = TWO_PI;
}
auto u_of = [](const Point3& p) {
return 0.10 * p.x() - 0.07 * p.y() + 0.13 * p.z();
};
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(idx), 0.0);
for (auto v : mesh.vertices())
x[static_cast<std::size_t>(maps.v_idx[v])] = u_of(mesh.point(v));
auto G = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x, maps);
// Java golden gradients keyed by vertex position (order-independent lookup).
struct GoldRow { double X, Y, Z, G; };
const GoldRow gold[4] = {
{ 1, 1, 1, 3.5277511803984396},
{ 1, -1, -1, 3.2837611905358440},
{-1, 1, -1, 2.3437485291237100},
{-1, -1, 1, 3.4111097143011780},
};
for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
const auto& p = mesh.point(v);
const double g = G[static_cast<std::size_t>(maps.v_idx[v])];
bool matched = false;
for (const auto& row : gold) {
if (std::abs(p.x() - row.X) < 1e-9 &&
std::abs(p.y() - row.Y) < 1e-9 &&
std::abs(p.z() - row.Z) < 1e-9) {
EXPECT_NEAR(g, row.G, 1e-12)
<< "gradient mismatch at (" << p.x() << "," << p.y()
<< "," << p.z() << ")";
matched = true;
break;
}
}
EXPECT_TRUE(matched) << "unexpected vertex position";
}
// ΔE = E(x) E(0). C++ path integral vs Java closed-form functional value.
std::vector<double> x0(static_cast<std::size_t>(idx), 0.0);
const double dE = euclidean_energy(mesh, x, maps)
- euclidean_energy(mesh, x0, maps);
EXPECT_NEAR(dE, 0.15962619236187336, 1e-12);
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Java cross-validation (Tier 1, GREEN) — circular-edge φ wiring (no solver)
//
// The "circular hole edge" of EuclideanCyclicConvergenceTest works by setting a
// non-default edge turn angle φ_e. Since the cyclic edge gradient is exactly
// G_e = α_opp(f⁺) + α_opp(f⁻) φ_e,
// lowering φ_e by 0.1 must raise G_e by exactly 0.1 — independent of geometry —
// and must leave every other gradient component untouched. This pins the φ
// wiring without needing the (not-yet-implemented) edge-DOF Hessian, so it runs
// today and is the evaluation-level prerequisite of the DISABLED convergence
// test below.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, CyclicCircularEdge_PhiEntersGradient_CatHead)
{
const std::string path = std::string(CONFORMALLAB_DATA_DIR) + "/obj/cathead.obj";
ConformalMesh mesh;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(mesh = load_mesh(path)) << "cathead.obj not found: " << path;
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
int idx = 0;
for (auto v : mesh.vertices())
maps.v_idx[v] = mesh.is_border(v) ? -1 : idx++;
for (auto e : mesh.edges())
maps.e_idx[e] = idx++;
const int n = idx;
ASSERT_GT(n, 0);
Edge_index e_circ{};
bool found = false;
for (auto e : mesh.edges()) {
auto h = mesh.halfedge(e);
auto ho = mesh.opposite(h);
if (mesh.is_border(h) || mesh.is_border(ho)) continue;
e_circ = e; found = true; break;
}
ASSERT_TRUE(found) << "no interior edge found on cathead";
const std::size_t ie = static_cast<std::size_t>(maps.e_idx[e_circ]);
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
maps.phi_e[e_circ] = PI;
auto G1 = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x, maps);
maps.phi_e[e_circ] = PI - 0.1;
auto G2 = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x, maps);
// Lowering φ_e by 0.1 raises exactly this edge's gradient component by 0.1.
EXPECT_NEAR(0.1, G2[ie] - G1[ie], 1e-12)
<< "circular-edge φ target not wired into the cyclic gradient";
// No other gradient component changes.
double max_other = 0.0;
for (std::size_t k = 0; k < G1.size(); ++k)
if (k != ie) max_other = std::max(max_other, std::abs(G2[k] - G1[k]));
EXPECT_LT(max_other, 1e-12)
<< "changing one φ_e perturbed unrelated gradient components";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Java cross-validation (Tier 1) — EuclideanCyclicConvergenceTest
//
// Ports de.varylab.discreteconformal.functional.EuclideanCyclicConvergenceTest:
// prescribe a non-default edge turn angle φ = π 0.1 on one interior edge of
// cathead.obj ("circular hole edge"), solve the cyclic Euclidean functional
// (vertex + edge DOFs), then assert the realised opposite-corner-angle sum
// across that edge equals π 0.1.
//
// The C++ edge gradient is G_e = α_opp(f⁺) + α_opp(f⁻) φ_e, so at the
// solution (G_e = 0) the geometric angle sum equals φ_e — exactly the Java
// assertion `circularEdge.getAlpha() + opposite.getAlpha() == π 0.1`.
//
// "Natural targets" first make x = 0 the equilibrium (so the *only* deviation
// is the prescribed φ); the test therefore FAILS if the solver ignores a
// non-default φ (the sum would stay at its natural value, not π 0.1).
//
// Enabled 2026-05-30: `newton_euclidean` now uses the block-FD edge-DOF Hessian
// (`euclidean_hessian_block_fd_sym`) for cyclic layouts, so the full solve runs.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, CyclicCircularEdge_CatHead_JavaXVal)
{
const std::string path = std::string(CONFORMALLAB_DATA_DIR) + "/obj/cathead.obj";
ConformalMesh mesh;
ASSERT_NO_THROW(mesh = load_mesh(path)) << "cathead.obj not found: " << path;
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
// DOFs: interior vertices (border pinned) + exactly ONE edge DOF on the
// "circular" edge (Java marks a single circularHoleEdge). Giving every edge
// a DOF would make λ_e redundant with u_i+u_j (a V-dim null space) and stall
// Newton; the single extra edge variable keeps the system well-posed.
int idx = 0;
for (auto v : mesh.vertices())
maps.v_idx[v] = mesh.is_border(v) ? -1 : idx++;
// Pick one interior edge: both incident faces present, both endpoints interior.
Edge_index circular{};
bool found = false;
for (auto e : mesh.edges()) {
auto h = mesh.halfedge(e);
auto ho = mesh.opposite(h);
if (mesh.is_border(h) || mesh.is_border(ho)) continue;
if (mesh.is_border(mesh.source(h)) || mesh.is_border(mesh.target(h))) continue;
circular = e; found = true; break;
}
ASSERT_TRUE(found) << "no interior edge found on cathead";
maps.e_idx[circular] = idx++; // the single circular-edge DOF
const int n = idx;
ASSERT_GT(n, 0);
const std::size_t ie = static_cast<std::size_t>(maps.e_idx[circular]);
// Natural targets: set Θ_v / φ_e so that x = 0 is the equilibrium (G(0)=0),
// so the only deviation is the prescribed circular φ below.
std::vector<double> x0(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
auto G0 = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x0, maps);
for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
int iv = maps.v_idx[v];
if (iv >= 0) maps.theta_v[v] -= G0[static_cast<std::size_t>(iv)];
}
maps.phi_e[circular] += G0[ie];
// Prescribe the circular edge turn angle φ = π 0.1 (Java CustomEdgeInfo.phi).
const double phi_target = PI - 0.1;
maps.phi_e[circular] = phi_target;
auto res = newton_euclidean(mesh, x0, maps, /*tol=*/1e-11, /*max_iter=*/200);
ASSERT_TRUE(res.converged)
<< "Newton did not converge; ||G||=" << res.grad_inf_norm;
// Realised geometric opposite-corner-angle sum = φ_e + G_e(x*) (= α_opp+α_opp).
auto Gf = euclidean_gradient(mesh, res.x, maps);
const double realised = maps.phi_e[circular] + Gf[ie];
EXPECT_NEAR(phi_target, realised, 1e-9)
<< "prescribed circular edge turn angle π0.1 not realised at the solution";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Correctness of the block-FD edge-DOF (cyclic) Hessian
//
// Validates `euclidean_hessian_block_fd` directly: on a tetrahedron with the
// full cyclic DOF layout (4 vertex + 6 edge), every entry must match the
// column-wise finite difference of `euclidean_gradient` (the true Jacobian of
// G). This pins the per-face output sign mapping (α vertex / +α_opp edge) and
// the scatter independently of the convergence test above.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, CyclicHessian_BlockFD_MatchesGradientFD_Tetrahedron)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
const int n = assign_euclidean_all_dof_indices(mesh, maps); // 4 + 6 = 10
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) x[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] = -0.15; // vertices
for (int i = 4; i < n; ++i) x[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] = 0.05; // edges
auto H = euclidean_hessian_block_fd(mesh, x, maps);
const double eps = 1e-6;
std::vector<double> xp = x, xm = x;
double max_err = 0.0;
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
const std::size_t sj = static_cast<std::size_t>(j);
xp[sj] = x[sj] + eps;
xm[sj] = x[sj] - eps;
auto Gp = euclidean_gradient(mesh, xp, maps);
auto Gm = euclidean_gradient(mesh, xm, maps);
xp[sj] = xm[sj] = x[sj];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
const double fd = (Gp[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)]
- Gm[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)]) / (2.0 * eps);
max_err = std::max(max_err, std::abs(H.coeff(i, j) - fd));
}
}
EXPECT_LT(max_err, 1e-5)
<< "block-FD cyclic Hessian disagrees with the gradient finite difference";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// Analytic cyclic Hessian == block-FD (and == gradient FD)
//
// `euclidean_hessian_analytic` is the closed-form counterpart of
// `euclidean_hessian_block_fd`. On the full cyclic layout they must agree to
// round-off, and both must match the gradient finite difference. This validates
// the analytic derivation (∂α_i/∂s_i = _i²/4A, ∂α_i/∂s_j = ½cot α_i _j²/4A).
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanFunctional, CyclicHessian_Analytic_MatchesBlockFD_Tetrahedron)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
const int n = assign_euclidean_all_dof_indices(mesh, maps); // 4 + 6 = 10
std::vector<double> x(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
for (int i = 0; i < 4; ++i) x[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] = -0.15;
for (int i = 4; i < n; ++i) x[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)] = 0.05;
auto Ha = euclidean_hessian_analytic(mesh, x, maps);
auto Hb = euclidean_hessian_block_fd(mesh, x, maps);
// Analytic vs block-FD.
double max_ab = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j)
max_ab = std::max(max_ab, std::abs(Ha.coeff(i, j) - Hb.coeff(i, j)));
EXPECT_LT(max_ab, 1e-6)
<< "analytic cyclic Hessian disagrees with block-FD";
// Analytic vs gradient FD (independent ground truth).
const double eps = 1e-6;
std::vector<double> xp = x, xm = x;
double max_af = 0.0;
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j) {
const std::size_t sj = static_cast<std::size_t>(j);
xp[sj] = x[sj] + eps;
xm[sj] = x[sj] - eps;
auto Gp = euclidean_gradient(mesh, xp, maps);
auto Gm = euclidean_gradient(mesh, xm, maps);
xp[sj] = xm[sj] = x[sj];
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i) {
const double fd = (Gp[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)]
- Gm[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)]) / (2.0 * eps);
max_af = std::max(max_af, std::abs(Ha.coeff(i, j) - fd));
}
}
EXPECT_LT(max_af, 1e-5)
<< "analytic cyclic Hessian disagrees with the gradient finite difference";
// Symmetry (Hessian of a scalar energy).
double max_sym = 0.0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
for (int j = 0; j < n; ++j)
max_sym = std::max(max_sym, std::abs(Ha.coeff(i, j) - Ha.coeff(j, i)));
EXPECT_LT(max_sym, 1e-9) << "analytic cyclic Hessian is not symmetric";
}
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
// DOF assignment gauge-vertex overload (Finding-D, external-audit-2026-05-30)
//
// The single-argument assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices() overwrites ALL
// v_idx unconditionally — setting a pin *before* the call has no effect.
// The two-argument overload (gauge vertex) pins the requested vertex in a
// single pass. These tests verify:
// (a) single-argument: gauge must be set AFTER, not before.
// (b) two-argument: the gauge vertex gets v_idx = -1, others are sequential.
// (c) Newton converges correctly when the gauge overload is used.
// ════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════════
TEST(EuclideanDOFAssignment, SingleArg_PinBeforeHasNoEffect)
{
// Pin first vertex before the call → the call overwrites it → not pinned.
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
auto first = *mesh.vertices().begin();
maps.v_idx[first] = -1; // set pin BEFORE — should have no effect
assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps);
EXPECT_GE(maps.v_idx[first], 0)
<< "Pre-call pin was overwritten: v_idx[first] must be >= 0 after the call";
EXPECT_EQ(euclidean_dimension(mesh, maps),
static_cast<int>(mesh.number_of_vertices()))
<< "All vertices should be free after single-arg assign";
}
TEST(EuclideanDOFAssignment, TwoArg_GaugeIsPinnedOthersAreSequential)
{
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
auto first = *mesh.vertices().begin();
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps, first);
EXPECT_EQ(maps.v_idx[first], -1)
<< "Gauge vertex must have v_idx = -1";
EXPECT_EQ(n, static_cast<int>(mesh.number_of_vertices()) - 1)
<< "Returned DOF count must be num_vertices - 1";
EXPECT_EQ(euclidean_dimension(mesh, maps), n)
<< "euclidean_dimension must equal returned count";
// All non-gauge vertices must have distinct indices in [0, n).
std::vector<int> seen;
for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
int iv = maps.v_idx[v];
if (v == first) continue;
EXPECT_GE(iv, 0);
EXPECT_LT(iv, n);
seen.push_back(iv);
}
std::sort(seen.begin(), seen.end());
for (int i = 0; i < n; ++i)
EXPECT_EQ(seen[static_cast<std::size_t>(i)], i)
<< "DOF indices must be sequential 0..n-1";
}
TEST(EuclideanDOFAssignment, TwoArg_NewtonConvergesWithGaugeOverload)
{
// End-to-end: use the gauge overload, then run Newton — confirms the
// pinned-vertex DOF layout is consistent with the solver.
auto mesh = make_tetrahedron();
auto maps = setup_euclidean_maps(mesh);
compute_euclidean_lambda0_from_mesh(mesh, maps);
auto first = *mesh.vertices().begin();
int n = assign_euclidean_vertex_dof_indices(mesh, maps, first);
// Natural-theta: set targets = actual angle sums at x=0 so x*=0 is the solution.
std::vector<double> x0(static_cast<std::size_t>(n), 0.0);
auto G0 = euclidean_gradient(mesh, x0, maps);
for (auto v : mesh.vertices()) {
int iv = maps.v_idx[v];
if (iv >= 0) maps.theta_v[v] -= G0[static_cast<std::size_t>(iv)];
}
auto res = newton_euclidean(mesh, x0, maps, 1e-10, 50);
EXPECT_TRUE(res.converged)
<< "Newton did not converge with gauge-overload DOF assignment";
EXPECT_LT(res.grad_inf_norm, 1e-9);
}