Adds a comprehensive 'External audit documents' section to the reviewer index:
- groups all 12 audits (correctness, API/perf/packaging, robustness)
- surfaces G0 (porting rights) as the cross-cutting release blocker
- records the decisions taken: coverage gate 80/70/90, API naming A1-A5
(A1-A3 implemented in PR #36, A4-A5 deferred pending G0/G1)
- points a new session at the low-risk quick-win findings
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Two additions that close out the reviewer-prep work cleanly:
1. doc/reviewer/hub.html + publish-workflow integration
──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
Move the hand-curated reviewer hub from the codeberg `pages`
branch (where it lived as an opaque snapshot) into the repo as
`doc/reviewer/hub.html`. `.gitea/workflows/doxygen-pages.yml`
gains a conditional `if [ -f doc/reviewer/hub.html ]; then …`
step that installs it as the publish `index.html` and demotes
the auto-generated Doxygen index to `/doxygen.html`.
Effect: merging any of the open PRs into main will trigger the
workflow, which republishes BOTH the Doxygen + the reviewer hub
together. The reviewer URL stays live across merges with zero
manual intervention.
Source-controlled benefits:
* hub edits go through normal PRs, not orphan-branch
force-pushes
* old hub versions live in git history
* the in-repo links now target `branch/main/…` instead of the
transient `preview/reviewer-snapshot-vN/…` paths
2. .gitea/workflows/perf-compile-time.yml — Linux CI bench
────────────────────────────────────────────────────────
New workflow runs on every push to main that touches the build
system or public headers. Five-step matrix measures and reports:
Run 1 cold baseline (no PCH, no Unity, no ccache)
Run 2 + PCH only
Run 3 + PCH + Unity (current default)
Run 4 + FAST_TEST_BUILD=ON (-O0 -g — Linux's expected ~40 % win)
Run 5 + ccache warm rerun (expected ≥ 90 % cache hit)
Validates the Apple-M1 predictions in doc/architecture/compile-time.md
against the Linux + g++ runner where Backend dominates more and
the Apple-clang+PCH friction that defeats ccache locally does not
apply. Job is data-collection only; never blocks a merge.
doc updates:
* doc/architecture/compile-time.md — new "Cross-platform perf bench"
section linking to the workflow + the table of macOS-vs-Linux
expected deltas.
* doc/reviewer/README.md — new "Hub-Page durability" subsection
explaining how the hub survives merges.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Updates the "Quick links the reviewer should bookmark" section of
doc/reviewer/README.md so it matches the Pages-hub v4 layout:
* the hub itself now carries status badges, a "what's new" banner,
and the research-alignment table — call this out so the reader
knows what to expect when they click through;
* adds direct links to the three documents that the new Q1/Q2/Q3
questions actually depend on (references.md, phases.md,
research-track.md) — previously only the Schläfli-derivation note
and the locked-vs-flexible architecture page were linked;
* re-points the Schläfli derivation link from "Q2" (old numbering)
to "Q3" (new numbering after baustein B inserted research
questions at Q1/Q2).
Companion change to the Pages-hub v4 already pushed to the codeberg
`pages` branch; this commit keeps the in-repo guidance in sync.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Replaces the "Springborn / Bobenko alumnus" placeholder in the reviewer
materials (briefing, questions, agenda, README) and in
locked-vs-flexible.md with a research-profile description:
active researcher in the decorated-DCE / Penner-coordinates /
canonical-tessellations / hyperideal-polyhedra line, treated as a
peer most likely to USE conformallab++ as numerical infrastructure
for their own future experiments — not merely to evaluate it.
Citations to the published literature (Springborn 2020 paper, etc.)
remain untouched. Only personal references to the prospective
reviewer were anonymised.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Three reviewer-meeting deliverables in one commit.
(1) output_uv_map for the two remaining DCE entries
─────────────────────────────────────────────────
* Discrete_inversive_distance.h: full implementation. After Newton,
reconstruct effective Euclidean edge lengths from the converged
log-radii via the Bowers-Stephenson identity
`ℓᵢⱼ² = rᵢ² + rⱼ² + 2·Iᵢⱼ·rᵢ·rⱼ`, populate a temporary
EuclideanMaps with `lambda0 = log(ℓᵢⱼ²)`, and reuse the existing
`euclidean_layout(mesh, 0, eucl)` priority-BFS. Per-vertex
Point_2 coordinates written into the user-supplied pmap.
Optional `normalise_layout(true)` applies the canonical PCA
centroid + major-axis rotation, same as the other 3 entries.
* Discrete_circle_packing.h: throws std::runtime_error with a
clear pointer to Phase 9c rather than silently producing
nonsense. CP-Euclidean is face-based; the faithful output is a
per-face circle packing in ℝ², not a per-vertex Point_2 map.
A true layout requires BPS-2010 §6 (~150 lines, on the porting
roadmap as Phase 9c). Failing loudly is the honest default.
Tests: 2 new cases in test_cgal_phase8b_lite.cpp
(OutputUvMap_InversiveDistance_PopulatesPmap;
OutputUvMap_CPEuclidean_ThrowsClearly). Both green.
Suite total now 259 (was 257, +2). CGAL subtotal: 234 → 236.
(2) Reviewer meeting documents
──────────────────────────
New directory doc/reviewer/ with three files:
* briefing.md — one-page orientation for the reviewer.
What the project is, where to look first
(https://tmoussa.codeberg.page/ConformalLabpp/), the headline
evidence (tests/coverage/sanitizers/license), what we want from
them, what's deferred and why, and the 5 questions in a separate
file.
* questions.md — the 5 concrete decisions we want their second
opinion on:
Q1 Phase 9c (port-literal vs re-derive)
Q2 Phase 9b-analytic (worth ~2 weeks for ~6× speedup?)
Q3 CP-Euclidean output_uv_map (build now or defer?)
Q4 CGAL submission strategy (one package or five?)
Q5 geometry-central cross-validation co-authorship
Plus an explicit "what would you say no to?" question at the
bottom — negative feedback is the highest-value information.
* agenda.md — my own internal playbook (NOT to be sent).
60-min flow: 5-min thank-you, 10-min architecture tour,
30-min for Q1-Q5 in the order Q4-Q1-Q2-Q5-Q3, 5-min "no"
question, 5-min wrap-up. Includes post-meeting memo template
to fill out in the 30 min after.
* README.md — index for the directory; says which file goes
to whom and when to send.
(3) locked-vs-flexible.md known-limitations update
─────────────────────────────────────────────
"output_uv_map covers 3 of 5 entries" → "covers 4 of 5".
CP-Euclidean's throws-clearly behaviour documented as a Phase 9c
deliverable rather than a passive gap.
Bonus: extended .codespellrc ignore list (acknowledgement, the
British-English spelling I used in agenda.md).
Verifications on this commit:
259/259 tests pass (0 skipped)
scripts/check-test-counts.sh: OK (23 + 236 = 259)
scripts/quality/license-headers.sh: OK (66/66 SPDX)
python3 scripts/quality/cgal-conventions.py: OK (0/6 violations)
scripts/quality/codespell.sh: OK (0 typos)
scripts/quality/shellcheck.sh: OK (0 findings)
python3 scripts/check-markdown-links.py: OK (143/143)
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
