Files
ConformalLabpp/doc/math/references.md
Tarik Moussa 068df474b1 docs: integrate publication analysis — Alexa, Bobenko, Springborn, Crane, Lutz
Add phases 9d / 9e / 9f and literature citations derived from a systematic
review of the five authors' publication lists (Tier 1 / 2 / 3 analysis).

phases.md:
  - Phase 9d: ConesUtility port (9d.1) + non-Euclidean cone extensions
    (9d.2, RESEARCH) + StereographicUnwrapper (9d.3)
  - Phase 9e: CirclePatternLayout + CirclePatternUtility (Java port)
  - Phase 9f: Polygon Laplacian on non-triangular meshes (Alexa 2011/2020,
    RESEARCH — no Java equivalent)
  - Phase 9b-analytic: add Rivin-Springborn 1999 as Schläfli source
  - Phase 10b: add Bobenko-Bücking 2009 + Bobenko-Lutz 2024 IMRN
  - Phase 10c: add Lutz 2023 (canonical tessellations) + Bobenko-Lutz 2024
  - Phase 10c' KoebePolyhedron: add Bowers-Bowers-Lutz 2026 rigidity result

references.md:
  - Crane et al. 2018 Optimal Cone Singularities (Phase 9d.2)
  - Bobenko-Lutz 2025 Discrete & Comput. Geom. (Phase 9d.2)
  - Bobenko-Lutz 2024 IMRN (Phase 10b/c)
  - Lutz 2023 Geom. Dedicata (Phase 10c)
  - Lutz PhD thesis TU Berlin 2024 (Phases 9d.2, 10b, 10c)
  - Bowers-Bowers-Lutz 2026 (Phase 9b-analytic + 10c')
  - Alexa-Wardetzky 2011 + Alexa 2020 (Phase 9f)
  - Bobenko-Bücking 2009 (Phase 10b)
  - Rivin-Springborn 1999 (Phase 9b-analytic)

research-track.md:
  - New entry: Phase 9d.2 non-Euclidean cone extensions (Bobenko-Lutz 2025
    + Crane 2018), with acceptance criteria
  - New entry: Phase 9f polygon Laplacian (Alexa-Wardetzky 2011 / Alexa 2020),
    with acceptance criteria

java-parity.md:
  - Split cone-metrics row into Euclidean (9d.1 port) and non-Euclidean
    (9d.2 research) with literature references
  - Add ConesUtility to "utility classes not yet ported" table

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-05-26 11:15:09 +02:00

8.3 KiB
Raw Blame History

References

Primary source

This library implements the algorithms from:

SechelmannVariational Methods for Discrete Surface Parameterization: Applications and Implementation, Doctoral thesis, TU Berlin 2016 The complete mathematical foundation: discrete conformal equivalence, variational angle-sum functionals, Newton solver, uniformization, period matrices, holonomy. DOI: 10.14279/depositonce-5415 · CC BY-SA 4.0

Java reference implementation: github.com/varylab/conformallab


References by module

Reference Used in
SpringbornIdeal Hyperbolic Polyhedra and Discrete Uniformization, Discrete & Computational Geometry (2020) hyper_ideal_geometry.hpp — ζ₁₃/ζ₁₄/ζ₁₅ functions; hyper_ideal_functional.hpp
Pinkall, PolthierComputing Discrete Minimal Surfaces and Their Conjugates, Experimental Mathematics (1993) euclidean_hessian.hpp — cotangent Laplacian
Bobenko, SpringbornVariational Principles for Circle Patterns and Koebe's Theorem, Transactions AMS (2004) Variational angle-sum framework underlying all three functionals
LuoCombinatorial Yamabe Flow on Surfaces, Communications in Contemporary Mathematics (2004) Inversive-distance functional — new research in Phase 9a.2 (no Java original; implemented from this paper + Glickenstein 2011 + Bowers-Stephenson 2004)
Bowers, StephensonUniformizing dessins and Belyĭ maps via circle packing, Memoirs of the AMS 170(805) (2004) Bowers-Stephenson identity I_ij = (²r_i²r_j²)/(2 r_i r_j) used to initialise inversive distance from input geometry (Phase 9a.2)
GlickensteinDiscrete conformal variations and scalar curvature on piecewise flat manifolds, J. Differential Geometry 87 (2011) Analytic Hessian of the inversive-distance functional (eq. 4.6) and cross-correspondence I_ij = cos θ_e between vertex-based (9a.2) and face-based (9a.1) circle packings
Bobenko, Pinkall, SpringbornDiscrete conformal maps and ideal hyperbolic polyhedra, Geometry & Topology 14 (2010) Face-based circle-packing functional (CPEuclideanFunctional.javacp_euclidean_functional.hpp, Phase 9a.1)
SchläfliOn the multiple integral ∫dx dy …, Quarterly Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics (1858/60) Volume differential 2 dV = Σ_e aₑ dαₑ + Σ_v bᵥ dβᵥ — foundation for the analytic HyperIdeal Hessian via Schläfli identity (Phase 9b-analytic, new research beyond Java)
Erickson, WhittleseyGreedy Optimal Homotopy and Homology Generators, SODA (2005) cut_graph.hpp — tree-cotree algorithm
Bobenko, SpringbornA Discrete LaplaceBeltrami Operator for Simplicial Surfaces, Discrete & Computational Geometry (2007) Background for cotangent weights
Desbrun, Kanso, TongDiscrete Differential Forms for Computational Modeling, SIGGRAPH Course Notes (2006) Discrete exterior calculus background for Phase 10a
Crane, Soliman, Ben-Chen, SchröderOptimal Cone Singularities for Conformal Flattening, ACM SIGGRAPH (2018). DOI: 10.1145/3197517.3201367 L¹-optimal automatic cone placement — Phase 9d.2 (non-Euclidean cone extensions). Provides the optimisation algorithm for choosing cone positions automatically; complements Bobenko-Lutz 2025 on non-Euclidean settings.
Bobenko, LutzDecorated Discrete Conformal Equivalence in Non-Euclidean Geometries, Discrete & Computational Geometry (2025). arXiv: 2310.17529 Phase 9d.2: extends DCE to hyperbolic + spherical geometry with Penner-coordinate decorations; unifies cone singularities and hyperideal cusps in one algebraic framework.
Bobenko, LutzDecorated Discrete Conformal Maps and Convex Polyhedral Cusps, IMRN 2024(12), pp. 95059534. arXiv: 2305.10988 Phase 10b/10c: discrete uniformization theorem for decorated piecewise Euclidean surfaces; connects Phase 2/3 hyperideal vertices (cusps at ∞) to the period matrix and fundamental domain.
LutzCanonical Tessellations of Decorated Hyperbolic Surfaces, Geometriae Dedicata 217 (2023). arXiv: 2206.13461 Phase 10c: canonical Delaunay tessellations in Penner coordinates; unifies the decorated framework with the fundamental domain construction for genus g ≥ 2.
LutzDecorated Discrete Conformal Equivalence, Canonical Tessellations, and Polyhedral Realization (PhD thesis, TU Berlin, 2024). DOI: 10.14279/depositonce-20357 Comprehensive single reference for Phases 9d.2, 10b, 10c — collects Bobenko-Lutz 2024/2025 and Lutz 2023 with complete proofs.
Bowers, Bowers, LutzRigidity of circle polyhedra and hyperideal polyhedra: the tangency case (2026). arXiv: 2601.22903 Phase 9b-analytic + Phase 10c' (KoebePolyhedron): theoretical uniqueness/rigidity for hyperideal polyhedra in the tangency case; supports correctness of the analytic Hessian and the KAT construction.
Alexa, WardetzkyDiscrete Laplacians on General Polygonal Meshes, ACM SIGGRAPH (2011). DOI: 10.1145/1964921.1964997 Phase 9f: virtual-node polygon Laplacian extending Pinkall-Polthier to non-triangular meshes. Enables DCE on quad/Voronoi meshes without triangulation.
AlexaDiscrete Laplacians on General Polygonal Meshes, ACM TOG 39(6) (2020). DOI: 10.1145/3414685.3417840 Phase 9f (extended journal version): error bounds, generalised polygon cotangent weights, convergence analysis.

geometry-central cross-reference (optional comparison track)

These references relate to an alternative implementation of the same mathematical problem. They are not prerequisites for conformallab++, but are relevant for cross-validation and possible algorithmic adoptions (→ GC-1/2/3 in the phase roadmap, → Section 9 in validation.md).

Reference Relevance
Gillespie, Springborn, CraneDiscrete Conformal Equivalence of Polyhedral Surfaces, ACM SIGGRAPH 2021. DOI: 10.1145/3450626.3459763 Implemented in geometry-central. Extends Springborn 2020 with intrinsic triangulations and Ptolemaic flips. Solves the same DCE problem as conformallab++, but with a different algorithm.
Sharp, Soliman, CraneNavigating Intrinsic Triangulations, ACM SIGGRAPH 2019 Algorithmic basis for SignpostIntrinsicTriangulation in geometry-central — relevant for GC-2 (optional pre-conditioning).

Note on Springborn 2020:
The paper "Ideal Hyperbolic Polyhedra and Discrete Uniformization" (Springborn, Discrete & Computational Geometry 2020) is already implemented in conformallab++ — it is the direct reference for the HyperIdeal geometry mode (hyper_ideal_geometry.hpp). The geometry-central implementation (Gillespie 2021) builds on this paper and augments it with Ptolemaic flips.


Phase 10 references (future research)

Reference Relevant for
Farkas, KraRiemann Surfaces, Springer GTM 71 Siegel period matrix, Teichmüller theory
SiegelTopics in Complex Function Theory, Vol. 2, Wiley Siegel upper half-space H_g, Sp(2g,) reduction
Bobenko, Mercat, SchmiesPeriod Matrices of Polyhedral Surfaces, in: Computational Approach to Riemann Surfaces (2011) Discrete period matrices on polyhedral surfaces
Bobenko, BückingConformal Structures and Period Matrices of Polyhedral Surfaces (2009) Phase 10b: explicit algorithm for computing the discrete Siegel period matrix Ωᵢⱼ on a polyhedral surface from cotangent-weighted integration.
Rivin, SpringbornThe Schläfli formula in Einstein manifolds with boundary, Electron. Res. Announc. AMS 5 (1999) Phase 9b-analytic: modern form of the Schläfli identity 2 dV = Σ aₑ dα for manifolds with boundary — the bilinear form used to derive the analytic HyperIdeal Hessian.