Closes the gap "no code-quality / convention gate" from the structural
review. Three new artefacts, all local-only (CI promotion deferred
until the existing tree is 100 % clean under each):
1. .clang-format — project's existing style mechanically captured
(4-space indent, opening brace on new line for class/struct/function,
left-aligned pointer/reference modifiers, aligned `using = ...` blocks,
100-col loose limit, no include re-ordering — matches code/include/
today).
2. scripts/quality/clang-format.sh — drift detector. Dry-run mode by
default (always exits 0); --strict to fail on drift; --fix to apply
suggested changes in place. Skips code/deps/ and macOS-duplicate
files.
3. scripts/quality/cgal-conventions.py — checker for the CGAL idioms
that clang-format/clang-tidy cannot express:
CGAL-1 include-guard format `CGAL_<DIRS>_<FILE>_H`
CGAL-2 every public header has a `\\file` Doxygen brief
CGAL-3 no nested namespaces beyond the allowed set
(CGAL::parameters, CGAL::Conformal_map, internal_np, IO)
CGAL-4 named-parameter tag types end in `_t`; value object does not
CGAL-5 no `using namespace ...` at file scope (header leakage)
CGAL-6 no #define beyond CGAL_* / include-guard
Result on the current tree: 6 CGAL public headers, 0 violations.
The checker therefore doubles as documentation of the conventions
we already follow.
Both are wired into scripts/quality/run-all.sh's fast subset (~5 s
combined wall time). README.md updated to split the gates into a
"style/convention" group (cheap, run-on-every-commit material) and a
"correctness/quality" group (slow, run-before-tag material).
The reviewer-facing locked-vs-flexible.md gains another "✅ Closed"
row documenting both gates and the 0-violation baseline.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.7 <noreply@anthropic.com>
85 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
85 lines
4.0 KiB
Markdown
# Local structural quality gates
|
||
|
||
This directory contains the structural quality checks that run **locally**
|
||
rather than in CI. They are intentionally not wired into
|
||
`.gitea/workflows/` (yet) because each is either too slow, too brittle
|
||
against the runner environment, or both — running them before a release
|
||
or before showing the repo to an external reviewer is the intended
|
||
workflow.
|
||
|
||
The CI gates that *are* enforced live in `.gitea/workflows/cpp-tests.yml`
|
||
and `.gitea/workflows/doxygen-pages.yml`; they cover the day-to-day
|
||
correctness loop (build + test + doxygen-coverage + test-count
|
||
consistency + markdown links + end-to-end smoke via `try_it.sh`).
|
||
|
||
## What runs locally
|
||
|
||
### Style / convention gates (run on every commit; cheap)
|
||
|
||
| Script | What it checks | Wall time | Prereqs |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `license-headers.sh` | every C++ source carries `SPDX-License-Identifier: MIT` | ~1 s | `bash` |
|
||
| `cgal-conventions.py` | CGAL-1…6: include-guard format, `\file` brief, namespace nesting, tag-naming, no `using namespace`, no stray `#define` | ~1 s | `python3` |
|
||
| `clang-format.sh` | every source file matches `.clang-format` (dry-run by default; `--fix` to apply) | ~2 s | `clang-format` ≥ 15 |
|
||
| `../check-markdown-links.py` | every internal markdown link resolves | ~2 s | `python3` |
|
||
|
||
### Correctness / quality gates (run before tagging or reviewer demos)
|
||
|
||
| Script | What it checks | Wall time | Prereqs |
|
||
|---|---|---|---|
|
||
| `sanitizers.sh` | fast test suite under ASan + UBSan | ~3 min | `clang++` ≥ 14 or `g++` ≥ 11 |
|
||
| `coverage.sh` | gcov/lcov line + branch coverage of `code/include/` | ~2 min | `lcov` |
|
||
| `clang-tidy.sh` | curated clang-tidy checks over public headers | ~2 min | `clang-tidy` ≥ 14, `.clang-tidy` |
|
||
| `multi-compiler.sh` | build + test under every detected gcc/clang | ~5 min × N compilers | any 2 of `g++`, `clang++` |
|
||
| `reproducible-build.sh` | two builds → byte-identical test executables | ~6 min | none beyond compiler |
|
||
| `cgal-version-matrix.sh` | build + CGAL test suite against multiple CGAL versions | ~5 min × N versions | CGAL trees under `~/cgal/<ver>/` (or `CGAL_ROOTS=...`) |
|
||
|
||
## How to use
|
||
|
||
```bash
|
||
# Fast subset (license + links + sanitizers + clang-tidy) — ~5 min total
|
||
bash scripts/quality/run-all.sh --fast
|
||
|
||
# Full sweep — ~25–40 min, intended for pre-release tagging
|
||
bash scripts/quality/run-all.sh
|
||
|
||
# One specific gate
|
||
bash scripts/quality/sanitizers.sh
|
||
```
|
||
|
||
Every gate writes its full output to `build-quality-logs/<gate>.log`
|
||
when invoked via `run-all.sh`, and to its own per-gate build directory
|
||
(`build-sanitizers/`, `build-coverage/`, `build-multi-<cc>/`, …) when
|
||
invoked directly.
|
||
|
||
## Promotion path to CI
|
||
|
||
Each gate can be wired into `.gitea/workflows/cpp-tests.yml` once two
|
||
conditions are met:
|
||
|
||
1. **The gate is green on the canonical dev machine.** If the script
|
||
exits 1 today, the CI gate would block every PR.
|
||
2. **There is a published policy line in `doc/release-policy.md`** that
|
||
explains what regression the gate catches and what the recovery is.
|
||
Future contributors should be able to read the error and know what
|
||
to fix.
|
||
|
||
Promoting a gate is a one-line change to `cpp-tests.yml`; the test
|
||
recipe is the script invocation itself.
|
||
|
||
## Known limitations
|
||
|
||
- `cgal-version-matrix.sh` does not download CGAL. Each version must
|
||
already be on the dev machine under `~/cgal/<ver>/` (override with
|
||
`CGAL_ROOTS=...:...`). The Dockerfile under
|
||
`.gitea/docker/Dockerfile.ci-cpp` could be extended to ship multiple
|
||
CGAL trees in a single image; not done yet.
|
||
- `sanitizers.sh` only instruments the fast (non-CGAL) test suite —
|
||
the CGAL templates are too expensive to compile under instrumentation
|
||
on most laptops.
|
||
- `clang-tidy.sh` requires a `.clang-tidy` config in the repo root; the
|
||
default Anthropic-quality lint set is intentionally minimal until the
|
||
reviewer signs off on the warning policy.
|
||
- `reproducible-build.sh` checks the test executables only. The
|
||
library is header-only, so there is nothing else to compare.
|